BEFORE THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 
 
FOR THE STATE OF WYOMING 
 
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL )
OF THE TERMO COMPANY )
FROM A FINAL PENALTY ) Docket No. 2000-77
ASSESSMENT BY DECISION )
BY THE DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ) 
 
FINDINGS OF FACT
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
DECISION AND ORDER 
 
 
APPEARANCES 
 
The Termo Company (Petitioner), Donna L. Sheaffer, Lands and 
Leases. 
 
Department of Revenue (DOR), Cathleen C. Parker, Assistant Attorney General.
 
DIGEST 
 
This matter was considered by Edmund J. Schmidt, Roberta A. 
Coates and Ron Arnold, the State Board of Equalization (SBOE), on written 
information and argument pursuant to a Briefing Order (Expedited Docket) dated 
May 9, 2000. The appeal arises from the assessment of a penalty by DOR for late 
filing of gross products returns (ATD-4 forms) on certain oil and gas properties 
of Petitioner's for 1997 production. 
 
The issue before the SBOE is:
Did Petitioner make a sufficient showing by a preponderance of credible evidence to refute the DOR's assessment of penalties?
JURISDICTION 
 
Upon application of any person adversely affected, the SBOE is 
mandated to review final DOR actions, including actions to certify taxable 
mineral production and demand taxes, interest and penalties on such mineral 
production. Wyo. Stat. 39-11-102.1(c). The SBOE shall "[h]old hearings 
after due notice in the manner and form provided in the Wyoming Administrative 
Procedure Act (Wyo. Stat. 16-3-101 through 16-3-115) and its own rules 
and regulations of practice and procedures." Wyo. Stat. 39-11-102.1(c).
 
The SBOE is required to "[d]ecide all questions that may arise with reference 
to the construction of any statute affecting the assessment, levy and collection 
of taxes, in accordance with the rules, regulations, orders and instructions 
prescribed by the department." Wyo. Stat. 39-11-102.1(a)(iv). The rules 
of practice and procedure for appeals before the SBOE involving tax matters 
contemplate appeals from final administrative decisions of the DOR. Rules, 
Chapter 2, 3, Wyoming State Board of Equalization. The rules require 
appeals be filed with the SBOE within thirty days of any final administrative 
decision. Rules, Chapter 2, 5, Wyoming State Board of Equalization.
 
DISCUSSION 
 
By letter dated February 28, 2000, the DOR initially assessed 
Petitioner penalty in the sum of $27,753 for an eleven month delinquent late 
filing of annual Gross Products tax reports (4000 Series), ATD-4 forms, for 1997 
oil and gas production on certain properties. The Petitioner filed this appeal 
challenging the assessment of this administrative penalty. Petitioner argues 
that the appropriate forms were prepared and the employee who was assigned the 
task of filing the gross products returns left her employment and the Petitioner 
assumed the forms were filed at the time the returns were due. The Petitioner 
also argues that staffing shortages due to declining oil prices in 1998, 
combined with unfamiliarity of the procedures and reporting requirements under 
Wyoming statutes caused delinquent filings. In addition, Petitioner argues they 
are taking steps to assure prompt filing of reports in the future. 
 
FINDINGS OF FACT 
 
1. The DOR's penalty assessment letter was dated February 28, 
2000. The attachment to DOR's penalty assessment letter contained an itemized 
breakdown of the penalty per property as follows: 
 
THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK 
 
Date Due: February 28, 2000
Penalty Date: December 28, 1998 
 
| County #5 | Property # | Product | Taxable Value | Penalty @ 1% | Months Late | Total Penalty | 
| 005 | 13395 | Oil | $183,397 | $1,834 | 11 | $20,174 | 
| 005 | 13395 | Gas | $19,774 | $198 | 11 | $2,178 | 
| 005 | 13870 | Oil | $20,526 | $205 | 11 | $2,255 | 
| 005 | 13870 | Gas | $28,598 | $286 | 11 | $3,146 | 
| $252,295 | Total | $27,753.00 | 
[SBOE Record, Department of Revenue Brief, Exhibit A]. 
 
2. The Petitioner filed its appeal letter on March 21, 2000.
[SBOE Record]. 
 
3. Petitioner requested the SBOE vacate the penalty assessment because 
Petitioner's employee responsible for filing gross product returns left 
employment without filing the returns. The form was completed and the Petitioner 
assumed the form was filed. The Petitioner stated there were staffing shortages 
and an unfamiliarity with the procedures and reporting requirements under 
Wyoming statutes. [SBOE Record]. 
 
4. The Board entered a Briefing Order (Expedited Docket), dated May 9, 2000, 
which provided the following deadlines: Petitioner's opening brief to be filed 
by June 12, 2000; Petitioner's request to rely upon letter of appeal to be filed 
by June 12, 2000; DOR's brief to be filed by July 13, 2000; and any Petitioner 
reply brief to be filed by July 27, 2000. [SBOE Record].
 
5. Petitioner filed a letter on June 12, 2000, indicating it would rely upon its original appeal letter of March 21, 2000, as its opening brief in the matter. [SBOE Record]
6. The DOR filed its response brief in a timely fashion on July 13, 2000. 
[SBOE Record]. 
 
7. Petitioner did not file a reply brief. 
 
8. Because of Petitioner's late filed returns, the DOR incurred additional administrative expenses because the initial certified values to the counties had to be amended by issuing notice of valuation changes. [Hopson Affidavit, Exhibits E]
9. Petitioner never filed a return. The DOR relied on the best information 
available, information from the Wyoming Oil and Gas Commission. The DOR 
attempted to verify the information with the Petitioner by letter dated 
September 23, 1998, however the Petitioner failed to respond. The DOR in a 
letter dated December 8, 1998, advised the Petitioner that the value for gross 
products would be increased. [Hopson Affidavit Para 5 and 6] 
 
10. Any discussion above or Conclusion of Law below which includes a finding 
of fact may also be considered a Finding of Fact and, therefore, is incorporated 
herein by this reference. 
 
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 
 
12. The letter of appeal by Petitioner was timely filed and the SBOE has 
jurisdiction to determine this matter. 
 
13. The applicable statutes which are determinative in this matter, provide 
in relevant part: 
 
Wyo. Stat. 39-14-209(d)(ii) 
 
Returns and reports. The following shall apply:
(i) Annually, on or before February 25 of the year following the year of 
production any person whose crude oil, lease condensate or natural gas 
production is subject to W.S. 39-14-202(a) shall sign under oath and submit a 
statement listing the information relative to the production and affairs of the 
company as the department may require to assess the production; 
 
Wyo. Stat. 39-14-208(d)(ii) 
 
If any person fails to file the ad valorem report required by W.S. 
39-14-207(a)(i) by the due date or any extension thereof, the department may 
impose a penalty equal to a total of one percent (1%) of the taxable value of 
the production from the well or property but not to exceed five thousand dollars 
($5,000.00) for each calendar month or portion thereof that the report or 
information is late. If any person fails to file reports and other information 
required by rule of the department of revenue other than those required by W.S. 
39-14-207(a)(v) or 39-14-207(a)(i), the department may impose a penalty of up to 
one thousand dollars ($1,000.00). The department may waive penalties under this 
subsection for good cause. Penalties imposed under this subsection may be 
appealed to the state board of equalization. 
 
14. Under the facts presented in this appeal, we conclude noncompliance could 
have been avoided through the exercise of reasonable care. In fact, Petitioner 
never filed a return but was assessed on information the DOR obtained from a 
third party source, the Wyoming Oil and Gas Commission. 
 
15. Wyo. Stat. 39-14-208(d)(ii) provides that, if "any person" fails 
to file its annual report, then DOR may impose a penalty. Petitioner was a 
"person" whose natural gas production was subject to taxation. The penalty 
statute was created as a negative incentive to encourage natural gas producers 
to file their annual gross products returns in a timely fashion. 
 
16. The excuses given by Petitioner for its late filing were that an employee 
responsible for filing the returns left employment without filing the returns, 
staff shortages and unfamiliarity with Wyoming statutory procedures.
 
17. The SBOE has previously addressed the common principles and objectives 
for penalty assessment and waiver that should be followed by the DOR. In the 
Matter of the Appeal of Lario Oil & Gas Company, Docket No. A-89-215, (April 12, 
1991), p.4. The Board recognizes the following as its penalty objective:
 
Administrative tax penalties exist for the purpose of encouraging voluntary 
compliance and not for other purposes, such as the raising of revenues. For 
penalties to be effective, similarly situated taxpayers should be treated 
similarly. Penalties should be sufficient to deter noncompliance before it 
happens and to encourage noncompliant taxpayers to correct noncompliance.
 
20. This penalty objective is not achieved without consideration of whether:
 
(a) noncompliance could have been avoided through the exercise of reasonable 
care; and 
 
(b) the penalty amount exceeds the bounds of reason under the circumstances. In the Matter of the Appeal of Lario Oil & Gas Company, Docket No.
A-89-215, (April 12, 1991), p.4. 
 
21. The Supreme Court has previously upheld this Board's interpretation of
Wyo. Stat. 39-14-208(d)(ii), formerly W.S. 39-5-101(g), in 
Petroleum, Inc. v. State of Wyoming ex rel. State Board of Equalization, 983 
P.2d 1237, 1241 (1999). The statute clearly provides for "a penalty equal 
to one percent (1%) of the taxable value of the production from the well or 
property but not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5000.00) for each calendar 
month or portion thereof that the report or information is late." 
 
22. Because Petitioner failed to report the DOR assessed $27,753 
in conformance with Wyo. Stat. 39-14-208(d)(ii). 
 
22. The SBOE concludes the penalty assessed by the DOR is reasonable given 
the failure to file the returns and the dollar amount of unreported oil and gas 
production in this matter. 
 
23. Petitioner has failed to carry its burden to show by a preponderance of 
credible evidence that the DOR's penalty assessments were arbitrary, capricious, 
an abuse of discretion or otherwise not in accordance with law. 
 
THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
ORDER 
 
IT IS THEREFORE HEREBY ORDERED: the DOR penalty assessment of 
$27,753.00, shall be, and is AFFIRMED. 
 
Pursuant to Wyo. Stat. 16-3-114 and Rule 12, Wyoming Rules of 
Appellate Procedure, any person aggrieved or adversely affected in fact by 
this decision may seek judicial review in the appropriate district court by 
filing a petition for review within 30 days of the date of this decision.
 
Dated this 11th day of August, 2000. 
 
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 
 
Edmund J. Schmidt, Chairman 
 
Roberta A. Coates, Vice-Chairman 
 
Ron Arnold, Member 
 
ATTEST:
Wendy J. Soto, Executive Secretary