BEFORE THE STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 
 
FOR THE STATE OF WYOMING 
 
IN THE MATTER OF THE APPEAL OF )
FLYING J INC., FROM A FINAL PENALTY ) Docket No. 99-189
ASSESSMENT BY DECISION BY THE )
DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE ) 
 
FINDINGS OF FACT
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
DECISION AND ORDER 
 
 
APPEARANCES 
 
Flying J. Inc. (Petitioner), Kathy Wood, Tax Representative
 
Department of Revenue (DOR), Karl D. Anderson, Assistant Attorney General.
 
DIGEST 
 
This matter was considered by Edmund J. Schmidt, Roberta A. 
Coates and Ron Arnold, the State Board of Equalization (SBOE), on written 
information and argument pursuant to a Briefing Order (Expedited Docket) dated 
May 8, 2000. The appeal arises from the assessment of a penalty by DOR for late 
filing of gross products returns (ATD-4 forms) on certain oil and gas properties 
of Petitioner's for 1998 production. 
 
The issue before the SBOE is:
Did Petitioner make a sufficient showing by a preponderance of credible evidence to refute the DOR's assessment of penalties?
JURISDICTION 
 
Upon application of any person adversely affected, the SBOE is 
mandated to review final DOR actions, including actions to certify taxable 
mineral production and demand taxes, interest and penalties on such mineral 
production. Wyo. Stat. 39-11-102.1(c). The SBOE shall "[h]old hearings 
after due notice in the manner and form provided in the Wyoming Administrative 
Procedure Act (Wyo. Stat. 16-3-101 through 16-3-115) and its own rules 
and regulations of practice and procedures." Wyo. Stat. 39-11-102.1(c).
 
The SBOE is required to "[d]ecide all questions that may arise with reference 
to the construction of any statute affecting the assessment, levy and collection 
of taxes, in accordance with the rules, regulations, orders and instructions 
prescribed by the department." Wyo. Stat. 39-11-102.1(a)(iv). The rules 
of practice and procedure for appeals before the SBOE involving tax matters 
contemplate appeals from final administrative decisions of the Department. 
Rules, Chapter 2, 3, Wyoming State Board of Equalization. The rules require 
appeals be filed with the SBOE within thirty days of any final administrative 
decision. Rules, Chapter 2, 5, Wyoming State Board of Equalization.
 
DISCUSSION 
 
By letter dated December 15, 1999, the DOR initially assessed 
Petitioner penalty in the sum of $24,368 for a three and four month delinquent 
late filing of annual Gross Products tax reports (4000 Series), ATD-4 forms, for 
1998 oil and gas production on certain properties. This penalty was reduced to 
$12,184. The Petitioner filed this appeal challenging the reduced assessment of 
this administrative penalty. Petitioner argues that the employee who was 
assigned the task of filing the gross products returns left her employment at 
the time the returns were due. In addition, Petitioner argues that it was 
employing a new accounting system that did not discover the unfiled returns. 
Because the new system is now working properly and because Petitioner had no 
problems filing returns in the past, it should not have to pay a penalty.
 
FINDINGS OF FACT 
 
1. The DOR's penalty assessment letter was dated December 15, 
1999. The attachment to DOR's penalty assessment letter contained an itemized 
breakdown of the penalty by property as follows: 
 
Date Due: April 26, 1999
Postmark Date: July 13, 1999 & August 26, 1999 
 
| Property # | Product | Taxable Value | Penalty @ 1% | Months Late | Total Penalty | 
| 07513 | Oil | $ 1,723 | $ 17 | 4 | $ 68 | 
| 10409 | Oil | $21,237 | $212 | 3 | $ 636 | 
| 12322 | Oil | $41,450 | $415 | 3 | $1,245 | 
| 12809 | Oil | $21,080 | $211 | 3 | $ 633 | 
| 12861 | Oil | $422,934 | $4,229 | 3 | $12,687 | 
| 12902 | Oil | $ 12,218 | $ 122 | 3 | $ 366 | 
| 12985 | Oil | $ 48,674 | $ 487 | 3 | $ 1,461 | 
| 13236 | Oil | $ 10,816 | $ 108 | 3 | $ 324 | 
| 13329 | Oil | $140,900 | $1,409 | 3 | $ 4,227 | 
| 13601 | Oil | $ 3,230 | $ 32 | 3 | $ 96 | 
| 14443 | Oil | $ 87,512 | $ 875 | 3 | $ 2,625 | 
| $811,774 | Total | $24,368.00 | 
[SBOE Record, Department of Revenue brief, Exhibit A]. 
 
2. The Petitioner filed its appeal letter on December 21, 1999.
[SBOE Record, Department of Revenue brief, Exhibit G ]. 
 
3. Petitioner requested the SBOE vacate the penalty assessment because 
Petitioner's employee responsible for filing gross product returns left 
employment without filing the returns and Petitioner had never previously failed 
to properly file its returns when due. [SBOE Record, Department of 
Revenue brief, Exhibit G]. 
 
4. The Board entered a Briefing Order (Expedited Docket) dated May 8, 2000, 
which provided the following deadlines: Petitioner's opening brief to be filed 
by June 9, 2000; Petitioner's request to rely upon letter of appeal to be filed 
by June 9, 2000; Department's brief to be filed by July 11, 2000; and any 
Petitioner reply brief to be filed by July 25, 2000. [SBOE Record].
 
5. Petitioner filed a letter on June 6, 2000, indicating it would rely upon its original appeal letter of December 21, 1999, as its opening brief in the matter.[SBOE Record]
6. The DOR filed its response brief in a timely fashion on July 11, 2000.
[SBOE Record]. 
 
7. The DOR reduced the penalty assessment to $12,184.00. [SBOE 
Record, Department of Revenue brief, Exhibit A] 
 
8. Petitioner did not file a reply brief. 
 
9. Because of Petitioner's late filed returns, the DOR incurred additional administrative expenses because the initial certified values to the counties had to be amended by issuing notice of valuation changes. [SBOE Record, Department of Revenue brief, Exhibits E & F]
10. Petitioner had requested an extension of time to file its return which extension was granted by the DOR until April 26, 1999. [SBOE Record, Department of Revenue brief, Exhibits B & C]
11. Although Petitioner ultimately filed the majority of its returns on July 
13, 1999, they were 78 days late. [Hopson Affidavit Para 6] 
 
12. Any discussion above or Conclusion of Law below which includes a finding 
of fact may also be considered a Finding of Fact and, therefore, is incorporated 
herein by this reference. 
 
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW 
 
13. The letter of appeal by Petitioner was timely filed and the 
SBOE has jurisdiction to determine this matter. 
 
14. The applicable statutes which are determinative in this matter, provide 
in relevant part: 
 
Wyo. Stat. 39-14-207(a) 
 
Returns and reports. The following shall apply: 
 
(i) Annually, on or before February 25 of the year following the year of 
production any person whose crude oil, lease condensate or natural gas 
production is subject to W.S. 39-14-202(a) shall sign under oath and submit a 
statement listing the information relative to the production and affairs of the 
company as the department may require to assess the production; 
 
Wyo. Stat. 39-14-208(d)(ii) 
 
If any person fails to file the ad valorem report required by W.S. 
39-14-207(a)(i) by the due date or any extension thereof, the department may 
impose a penalty equal to a total of one percent (1%) of the taxable value of 
the production from the well or property but not to exceed five thousand dollars 
($5,000.00) for each calendar month or portion thereof that the report or 
information is late. If any person fails to file reports and other information 
required by rule of the department of revenue other than those required by W.S. 
39-14-207(a)(v) or 39-14-207(a)(i), the department may impose a penalty of up to 
one thousand dollars ($1,000.00). The department may waive penalties under this 
subsection for good cause. Penalties imposed under this subsection may be 
appealed to the state board of equalization. 
 
15. Under the facts presented in this appeal, we conclude noncompliance could 
have been avoided through the exercise of reasonable care. 
 
16. Wyo. Stat. 39-14-208(d)(ii) provides that, if "any person" fails 
to file its annual report, then DOR may impose a penalty. Petitioner was a 
"person" whose natural gas production was subject to taxation. The penalty 
statute was created as a negative incentive to encourage natural gas producers 
to file their annual gross products returns in a timely fashion. 
 
17. The only excuse given by Petitioner for its late filing was that an 
employee responsible for filing the returns left employment without filing the 
returns. 
 
18. The SBOE has previously addressed the common principles and objectives 
for penalty assessment and waiver that should be followed by the DOR. In the 
Matter of the Appeal of Lario Oil & Gas Company, Docket No. A-89-215, (April 12, 
1991), p.4. The Board recognizes the following as its penalty objective:
 
Administrative tax penalties exist for the purpose of encouraging voluntary 
compliance and not for other purposes, such as the raising of revenues. For 
penalties to be effective, similarly situated taxpayers should be treated 
similarly. Penalties should be sufficient to deter noncompliance before it 
happens and to encourage noncompliant taxpayers to correct noncompliance.
 
19. This penalty objective is not achieved without consideration of whether:
 
(a) noncompliance could have been avoided through the exercise of reasonable 
care; and 
 
(b) the penalty amount exceeds the bounds of reason under the circumstances. In the Matter of the Appeal of Lario Oil & Gas Company, Docket No.
A-89-215, (April 12, 1991), p.4. 
 
20. The Supreme Court has previously upheld this Board's interpretation of
Wyo. Stat. 39-14-208(d)(ii), formerly W.S. 39-5-101(g), in 
Petroleum, Inc. v. State of Wyoming ex rel. State Board of Equalization, 983 
P.2d 1237, 1241 (1999). The statute clearly provides for "a penalty equal 
to one percent (1%) of the taxable value of the production from the well or 
property but not to exceed five thousand dollars ($5000.00) for each calendar 
month or portion thereof that the report or information is late." 
 
21. Because Petitioner reported three to four months late, the DOR initially 
imposed a three to four month penalty amounting to $24,368.00 which was 
correctly assessed in conformance with Wyo. Stat. 39-14-208(d)(ii). 
This amount was later reduced to $12,184.00 which was within the prerogative of 
the DOR and certainly reasonable. 
 
22. The SBOE concludes the penalty assessed by the DOR is reasonable given 
the lateness in filing the returns and the dollar amount of unreported oil and 
gas production in this matter. 
 
23. Petitioner has failed to carry its burden to show by a preponderance of 
credible evidence that the DOR's penalty assessments were arbitrary, capricious, 
an abuse of discretion or otherwise not in accordance with law. 
 
THIS SPACE INTENTIONALLY LEFT BLANK
ORDER 
 
IT IS THEREFORE HEREBY ORDERED: the DOR penalty assessment of 
$12,184.00, shall be, and is AFFIRMED. 
 
Pursuant to Wyo. Stat. 16-3-114 and Rule 12, Wyoming Rules of 
Appellate Procedure, any person aggrieved or adversely affected in fact by 
this decision may seek judicial review in the appropriate district court by 
filing a petition for review within 30 days of the date of this decision.
 
Dated this 11th day of August, 2000. 
 
STATE BOARD OF EQUALIZATION 
 
Edmund J. Schmidt, Chairman 
 
Roberta A. Coates, Vice-Chairman 
 
Ron Arnold, Member 
 
ATTEST:
Wendy J. Soto, Executive Secretary